Your Opinions
"How would you spend £45 million a day?"
 
Donate
Banner

PostHeaderIcon News

PostHeaderIcon The view from here

9 August 2010

 

 

Smile. It’s not that bad. Ask Irene Graham, of Boscombe, who delighted an audience with her reminiscences of a German POW who was sent each week to do her garden: “He was repatriated at the end of 1945,” she recalled. “He’d always seemed such a nice friendly chap, but when the crocuses came up in the middle of our lawn in February 1946, they spelt out ‘Heil Hitler’.”

 

Or how about Stuart Isbister, who runs a small gift shop in Nottingham? When the smoking ban was introduced, he refused to display a “No Smoking” sign on his window. “We just don’t think it necessary to have a sign. We have a small amount of space and wanted to keep the door area simple and uncluttered. It is completely disproportionate and totally unnecessary. People just don’t smoke in shops. We don’t have signs on the door saying no thieving and no dropping your trousers, yet both of these are against the law.”

 

As part of its war against smokers the previous Labour government generated a massive bureaucracy and an army of enforcement officers employed by councils (that means YOU in case you hadn’t realised) requiring all stores, public buildings, even churches, to display a No Smoking sign.

 

Nottingham Council took Mr Isbister to court, and lost, because they hadn’t followed the correct procedure, but it’s only a matter of time before smoking is banned totally. Already the EU zealots are getting into the act. As reported by the News of the World last year: “Brussels chiefs want to outlaw beer-garden ciggie areas – and even extend the ban to open air concerts like this weekend’s Glastonbury Festival. It says non-smokers in outdoor areas are still in danger from passive smoking.”

 

Sorry if I lose a few of you here, but this is utter madness. I can accept that shops, churches, restaurants etc should be non-smoking, but pub landlords (and private clubs) should be free to allow smoking if they want; and banning smoking in the open air is health fascism from the asylum. Please remember that the first person to ban smoking in Europe was Adolf Hitler (though only among women; his generals warned him that if he wanted to lose the war, all he had to do was prevent the troops from lighting up and the Russians would be in Berlin by next Wednesday).

 

But with the eurozone in meltdown, I suspect this proposal has been temporarily stubbed out, so let’s keep smiling and light up another jolly old gasper.

 

David Challice

UK Independence Party

 

For more information FREEPHONE: 0800 587 6587 or visit www.ukip.org

Last Updated (Monday, 09 August 2010 08:37)

 

PostHeaderIcon EU cost to Britain every year

How much does the EU cost Britain every year?

Estimates from a Commissioner once put the figure of the red tape bill across the whole of the EU at a gut-wrenching €600 billion, in which case Britain’s bill would come in at around a ballpark £50 billion once you added in the membership fees. Even that figure has been challenged as optimistic, with some calculations estimating the true cost as up to twice that.

It’s a subject many in Whitehall and Brussels would like to draw a veil over. But thanks to a question by MP Philip Davies, and an honest answer from minister Mark Prisk, we have a clearer idea.

In the course of just this current year, it is calculated by Government itself that the whole new red tape bill for the country will come to between £27.8 billion and £30.3 billion. 31 per cent of that – i.e. between £8.6 billion and £9.4 billion – is assessed to be new Brussels red tape.

This raises two questions. Firstly, what on earth is Whitehall doing absurdly generating £20 billion of red tape for businesses, charities and individuals in its own right? Secondly, given that £9 billion of new red tape is coming from Brussels this one year, does that not confirm the higher estimate of Britain’s EU costs, and the shocking reality that the UK is now paying more in red tape costs to regulate our trade with the EU than the actual value of that trade itself?

Both absurdities are inexcusable. Good luck to Mr Prisk and his boss if they now begin addressing them.

Thanks to T.A.

Lee Rotherham

Last Updated (Saturday, 07 August 2010 13:12)

 

PostHeaderIcon License payers money squandered

How your millions are being squandered to bribe reluctant BBC staff to move up north

 

[click on above to read more]

 

PostHeaderIcon Countryside already has `Big Society` of volunteers

Countryside already has a 'Big Society' of volunteers

 

In the abstract, David Cameron's "big society" ideas appeared to have merit. Brought down the nitty gritty, however, many of them look full of holes....

Read full story

 

PostHeaderIcon The New Colonials

The French and Germans want a new (old?!) colonial approach plus Timothy Kirkhope Leader of the Conservatives in the European Parliament says that more power for the EU is better:

 

 
More Articles...